Why licensing all drivers, regardless of immigration status, makes economic sense

If an age-eligible immigrant without status can pass a driving test, the state should issue them driver’s licenses so they can drive safely to work, school, doctor’s offices, and other places without fear.

There are myriad health, safety, and social reasons to grant licenses to immigrants without status. One of these reasons is economic.

Below are updated versions of our reports that estimate the economic and state fiscal impacts of such a policy. The latest data are primarily from 2018 and 2019.

What’s new:

  • If Massachusetts licenses all drivers, regardless of immigration status, an estimated 45,000 to 85,000 drivers would obtain new licenses within three years of implementation.
  • In the first three years of implementation, the new law could generate an additional $5 million from fees on new licenses, car registrations, titles, inspections, and others.
  • In addition, the state could see an additional $5.1 million per year from taxes on car-related purchases and motor fuel.
  • Newly licensed drivers could spend an additional $14.3 million on cars and parts.
  • Newly licensed drivers could spend an additional $75 million on new insurance policies.
  • Of about 182,000 immigrants without status in Massachusetts, 32 percent work in the service sector, 31 percent work in management, business, science, and the arts, and 13 percent work in production, transportation, and material moving.
  • More than a third of adults without status in Massachusetts holds a bachelor’s degree or higher.
  • 16 other states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico already license all drivers, regardless of immigration status.

Find the full reports:

 

 

Latest

Fundamentally Flawed: 62F Formula Overstates “Excess” by $1.4 Billion

The $2.9 billion estimate of 62F “excess tax collections” recently certified by the State Auditor overstates these net Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 collections by $1.4 billion. The problem is not that the Auditor miscalculated but that the calculation as stipulated in the 62F statute fails to account for situations where taxes are received by the Commonwealth in one fiscal year, but corresponding, offsetting tax credits are not applied until the following fiscal year. This is one of the many fundamental flaws in the 1986 tax cap law (referred to as “62F”).

Read More →

Where Might Home Sales Be Subject to the Fair Share Amendment? A Local Breakdown

In the majority of Massachusetts cities and towns, no homes sold for a net gain of $1 million or more, meaning they wouldn’t be subject to any additional taxes under the Fair Share Amendment.

Read More →

62F Credits Benefit the Rich

The “tax cap law,” or what is known as “62F,” sets an artificial limit on how much tax revenue Massachusetts can collect, regardless of the current needs of the Commonwealth. This law in effect transfers to higher income households tax revenue paid by lower income households and does nothing to improve racial or economic equity in our state.

Read More →
Scroll to Top

Get news from Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center in your inbox.