Testimony to the Joint Ways and Means Committees on Using Federal ARPA Funds to Invest in Public Higher Education

October 1, 2021

Chairman Rodrigues, Chairman Michelwitz, and distinguished members of the Joint Committee on Ways and Means:

Thank you for the opportunity to testify on plans for using the unassigned federal American Rescue Plan Act funding in Massachusetts.

My name is Anastasia Martinez and I am a policy analyst at the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center, a nonpartisan research organization that works with partners and policymakers to advance racial and economic equity in the Commonwealth.

Today, I will be sharing how COVID-19 has exacerbated inequities in our public higher education system and urge for investments in our students.

Overall, there have been no major investments in our higher education system in over two decades.1 Despite a lack of investment, tuition and fees have continued to increase over the years, effectively placing the cost burden onto students and families. While rising tuition and fees have not helped the situation, there is also clear evidence that tuition and fees are not even half of the total cost of attendance students are expected to take on now.

Think back to your days as a college student. After you paid tuition, was that the end of your money worries? Of course not. Next comes books, supplies, rent, food costs, transportations, and for many of our students, childcare costs. These costs are forcing more students and families to take out and graduate with larger amounts of debt. The average debt for graduates now in Massachusetts is over $30,000 and is only growing.2

As grim as this all sounds, it’s only gotten worse with COVID-19. Not only are students taking on more debt, but the fear of debt and costs are causing some students—mostly students of color—to put off higher education altogether. At our community colleges alone, enrollment of first-time freshmen dropped about 33% for Black students and 25% for Latinx students.3

The passage of the American Rescue Plan Act presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for massive investments and bold initiatives to our public higher education system, which are needed. There’s already clear evidence that a well-educated workforce not only benefits those workers but the economy.

Denying low-income students and students of color affordable access to higher education not only exacerbates inequities but hurts the state. Therefore, MassBudget is urging policymakers to consider using a portion of these federal funds to eliminate tuition and fees for all students AND invest in non-loan aid such as scholarships for historically marginalized students to cover their cost of living, allowing them to truly graduate debt-free.

Federal guidelines for the American Rescue Plan Act funds clearly state that funds should be used to address disparities exacerbated by the pandemic. Providing debt-free higher education helps reduce barriers and disparities to higher education, especially for low-income students and students of color. This, in turn, increases equity and allows these students to build wealth later more easily in life (such as buying a home), boosts the economy, and creates a larger workforce. Again, I respectfully ask you all to invest in our students during this unprecedented time.

Thank you for your consideration.

Endnotes

1 Anastasia Martinez, “Choosing Equity: Options for Affordable Public Higher Education in Massachusetts,” https://massbudget.org/2021/03/24/choosing-equity/

2 Anastasia Martinez, “Choosing Equity: Options for Affordable Public Higher Education in Massachusetts,” https://massbudget.org/2021/03/24/choosing-equity/

3 Department of Higher Education, “Equity Spotlight” https://www.mass.edu/datacenter/2020enrollmenttrends.asp

Latest

Fundamentally Flawed: 62F Formula Overstates “Excess” by $1.4 Billion

The $2.9 billion estimate of 62F “excess tax collections” recently certified by the State Auditor overstates these net Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 collections by $1.4 billion. The problem is not that the Auditor miscalculated but that the calculation as stipulated in the 62F statute fails to account for situations where taxes are received by the Commonwealth in one fiscal year, but corresponding, offsetting tax credits are not applied until the following fiscal year. This is one of the many fundamental flaws in the 1986 tax cap law (referred to as “62F”).

Read More →

Where Might Home Sales Be Subject to the Fair Share Amendment? A Local Breakdown

In the majority of Massachusetts cities and towns, no homes sold for a net gain of $1 million or more, meaning they wouldn’t be subject to any additional taxes under the Fair Share Amendment.

Read More →

62F Credits Benefit the Rich

The “tax cap law,” or what is known as “62F,” sets an artificial limit on how much tax revenue Massachusetts can collect, regardless of the current needs of the Commonwealth. This law in effect transfers to higher income households tax revenue paid by lower income households and does nothing to improve racial or economic equity in our state.

Read More →
Scroll to Top

Get news from Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center in your inbox.