Housing Justice = Racial Justice

Maria has been living in fear. Her landlord has been rapping on her door, harassing her and her children for the rent. But, since both Maria and her husband have lost their jobs during the COVID-19 crisis, they can’t pay rent.

“We cannot pay the rent if we don’t have jobs,” Maria said through an interpreter at an Oct. 21 rally to pass the Housing Equity Bill. “This is so scary and this bill… is the only solution to protect us from being evicted, from going to the streets.”

The eviction crisis in Massachusetts has been a tale of two realities. For those who do not work directly with renters facing eviction, the picture is rosy: the superficial data show no tidal wave of evictions. But for those who speak daily with renters, much of the state’s promised aid is not reaching them and has not stopped the bleeding. For those on the ground, programs like the Eviction Diversion Initiative and existing court processes are far from adequate.

People are still fighting evictions — both formally and informally (through notices or threats that never make it into the court database). At the rally, organizers, advocates, and direct-service housing professionals took to the streets to raise awareness about the ongoing evictions in Massachusetts.

The system is missing much of the real picture for several reasons:

  • No fault evictions are still happening, leaving a pathway for landlords to circumvent the protections put in place for people at risk of eviction due to an inability to pay.
  • Landlords don’t need to explore options through rental assistance programs before filing to evict their tenants.
  • Even if a landlord starts the eviction process but doesn’t ultimately evict their tenants, those tenants can have a permanent stain on their court record, leaving them vulnerable to future housing discrimination.
  • It misses the reality that many small landlords — who also have been financially impacted during COVID — are not being fully protected from foreclosure by the state.

The bottom line is: help has not arrived — and we need to increase eviction protections while people wait for that help to materialize.

The reality people are facing makes the case for why the state needs to pass the COVID-19 Housing Equity Bill, an act to prevent COVID-19 evictions and foreclosures and promote an equitable housing recovery. The bill would offer more protection than Governor Baker’s eviction moratorium, which expired more than a year ago, by:

  1. Temporarily pausing no-fault evictions;
  2. Reinstating a pause on foreclosures and requiring forbearance based on federal standards to better protect homeowners; and
  3. Requiring the state to make the rental assistance process more accessible, transparent, and navigable.

The tenants that are slipping through the cracks of existing systems aren’t just a few for whom the protections aren’t enough. Many of these tenants were already the most vulnerable to disparities in housing, income, and wealth. They are now among those hardest hit by the pandemic. When our solutions center them, they better serve everyone.

Latest

Fundamentally Flawed: 62F Formula Overstates “Excess” by $1.4 Billion

The $2.9 billion estimate of 62F “excess tax collections” recently certified by the State Auditor overstates these net Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 collections by $1.4 billion. The problem is not that the Auditor miscalculated but that the calculation as stipulated in the 62F statute fails to account for situations where taxes are received by the Commonwealth in one fiscal year, but corresponding, offsetting tax credits are not applied until the following fiscal year. This is one of the many fundamental flaws in the 1986 tax cap law (referred to as “62F”).

Read More →

Where Might Home Sales Be Subject to the Fair Share Amendment? A Local Breakdown

In the majority of Massachusetts cities and towns, no homes sold for a net gain of $1 million or more, meaning they wouldn’t be subject to any additional taxes under the Fair Share Amendment.

Read More →

62F Credits Benefit the Rich

The “tax cap law,” or what is known as “62F,” sets an artificial limit on how much tax revenue Massachusetts can collect, regardless of the current needs of the Commonwealth. This law in effect transfers to higher income households tax revenue paid by lower income households and does nothing to improve racial or economic equity in our state.

Read More →
Scroll to Top

Get news from Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center in your inbox.