MassBudget testifies to end tax subsidy for private jets

MassBudget’s Phineas Baxandall testified today in support of House bill 2826 and Senate bill 1758, which would end the sales tax exemption for aircraft. This handout to the ultra-wealthy—those who can afford to own personal aircraft like private jets and helicopters—costs the Commonwealth an estimated $27.6 million in foregone revenue annually. On top of that, the current policy also worsens climate change by encouraging the most fuel-intensive form of travel.
Repealing this tax subsidy would promote equity in our tax code and provide the state with more resources for the public good. It’s an easy fix that helps re-align our policies with our values.

Testimony to the Joint Committee on Revenue

September 12, 2023

RE: Testimony in support of An Act Relevant to the Repeal of the Sales Tax Exemption for Aircraft (H.2826/S.1758).

Chair Cusack, Chair Moran, and distinguished members of the Joint Committee on Revenue:

Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony on behalf of the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center in support of H.2826/S.1758: An Act Relevant to the Repeal of the Sales Tax Exemption for Aircraft.

The bill would end the current sales tax subsidy for private jets and other personal aircraft. The current sales and use tax for aircraft and aircraft parts applies only to those who own aircraft for private use because businesses and nonprofit organizations are separately exempt from sales tax on business purchases.

I urge the Committee to ask why the Commonwealth would take special pains to subsidize private jets and helicopters. We provide no similar special subsidy for personal cars or bicycles. The special preference is fiscally costly, accelerates climate change, and is targeted to those who need it least.

  • Fiscally costly: According to the Department of Revenue’s Fiscal Year 2024 Tax Expenditure Report, the current special exemption for aircraft and aircraft parts from the sales tax will cost the Commonwealth’s General Fund $26.7 million this year. Every dollar lost to this exemption is a dollar that could be instead invested in public programs or used for other forms of tax reduction.
  • Environmentally destructive: Air travel burns extraordinarily large volumes of fuel, making it especially harmful to the environment and climate. Traveling by private jets is 10 to 20 times more fuel-intensive than commercial air travel. Exempting aircraft (or their parts and storage) from sales tax subsidizes this form of travel, which accelerates climate change and worsens air quality and noise pollution. Eliminating the tax exemption would better align tax policy with state strategies on climate change.
  • Worsens inequality: Owning and operating an aircraft for personal use is an expensive luxury. Aircraft owners tend to be very wealthy, especially those who own private jets. Targeting special tax preferences to them increases inequality in the Commonwealth.

We urge the Committee to favorably pass this bill out of Committee.


Phineas Baxandall
Policy Director
Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center


How Much Would a Transfer Fee on Expensive Real Estate Generate for Your City or Town?

An interactive dashboard that provides data for each of Massachusetts' 351 cities and towns on how much revenue a community could raise by collecting an ...
Read More →

How Baby Bonds Could Reduce Massachusetts’ Growing Wealth Gap

Across Massachusetts, racial wealth gaps are among the widest in the country. Structural barriers prevent or challenge households of color from building assets that could ...
Read More →

Testimony in Support of H2762/S1793 and S1798 on Improving Tax Credits

MassBudget's written testimony in support of H2762/S1793, An Act to increase family stabilization through the earned income tax credit as well as S1798, An Act ...
Read More →
Scroll to Top

Get news from Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center in your inbox.